
I read it slowly, cover to cover, and thought I'd unleash my two cents on the book. This novel (and I'll reiterate...NOVEL) came by me highly recommended. In fact, I was a little leary reading it BECAUSE of all the hype. Then I had friends calling me and telling me "it's the most AMAZING book you'll ever read!" Still I had other friends telling me it's heretical and theologically unsound. Chris breezed through it before me, but my literary digestive system is much slower in cases such as this.
The first 5 chapters went pretty quickly, as it reads much like any mystery novel. But then chapter 6 happens, and all I could think was "what the...!?" I can't give away the storyline, but let's just say that God is portrayed in a very unconventional way. While I don't think the story is heretical, I do think it needs to be read with discretion. With any novel that is inclusive of religious theology, there are often elements of truth...but those are usually interminged with lots of imagination on the author's part, or how they interpret scripture. It, after all, has no more authority on God's reasoning than
Left Behind has on the tribulation.
The objectives of this book are clearly twofold:
1) To answer the question of why God allows suffering, and
2) To give us a tangible, intimate understanding of the Trinity.
It does the first, I think, very well. Then again, will we EVER know the answer to that? All we can do is draw our best conjecture and leave the rest to faith. The second was a little harder for me to swallow. If you've read the book, you know exactly what I'm talking about. And I wasn't a big fan of all the crazy "color" stuff, either. But during the sermon at our church on Sunday on "intimate relationships," I found myself picturing the scenarios in "The Shack". In that way, I suppose it accomplished it's goal.
I'm interested in your opinions...
Fire away.